Nikhil Krishna

← all projects

A Comprehensive Machine Learning Paradigm for Space Debris Surveillance

three machine learning models that find debris, predict its orbit and assess collision risk, and a space based laser design for debris removal

project
01 of 05
event
ISEF, 4th in Physics & Astronomy
credit
Research project with one partner, Nived Nandakumar. published on SSRN.
links
Read the paper →

01the problem

  • millions of fragments from old rockets and dead satellites now orbit Earth
  • Kessler syndrome is the runaway case, where each collision creates debris that causes the next
  • ground telescopes only track the larger pieces and the atmosphere distorts what they see
  • no system has actually removed debris, only proposals and planned missions
fragments sharing low Earth orbit with working satellites
Tracked objects in orbit over a 64 year period. Source: European Space Agency, 2024.
Fig. 1. Tracked objects in orbit over a 64 year period. Source: European Space Agency, 2024.

02model one, detection

  • convolutional neural network trained on over 5,000 labeled orbital images
  • multi task loss combining classification, localization and confidence
  • anchor boxes refined against ground truth by minimizing intersection over union
  • random scaling, rotation and flipping to make it generalize
the network boxes and classifies each object it finds
Detection output on a held out test image.
Fig. 2. Detection output on a held out test image.
Localization loss, penalizing a box in the wrong place or of the wrong size.
Eq. 1. Localization loss, penalizing a box in the wrong place or of the wrong size.

03model two, trajectory

  • physics informed neural network with an LSTM layer reading trajectory history
  • Kepler's third law, eccentricity limits, drag and gravity all enforced as loss terms
  • a plain network drifts into orbits that cannot physically exist, the constraints stop that
  • time derivatives modeled with gradient tape so predictions stay smooth
faster at perigee, slower at apogee, the way a real orbit moves
Total loss, combining prediction error with four weighted physics penalties.
Eq. 2. Total loss, combining prediction error with four weighted physics penalties.
Kepler's third law written as a residual. Zero when period and semi-major axis agree.
Eq. 3. Kepler's third law written as a residual. Zero when period and semi-major axis agree.
A predicted orbit for a piece of Ariane 42P rocket debris.
Fig. 3. A predicted orbit for a piece of Ariane 42P rocket debris.

04model three, collision risk

  • random forest regressor, 100 decision trees on bootstrapped samples
  • works from relative speed, distance and approach angle
  • risk predicted on a log base 2 scale for resolution at low probabilities
  • averaging decorrelated trees cuts variance, which the formula makes explicit
inputs fan out to 100 trees and the answers are averaged
Why averaging works, and why decorrelating the trees matters.
Eq. 4. Why averaging works, and why decorrelating the trees matters.

05the laser application

  • the three models feed a proposed satellite carrying a pulsed laser
  • focused heat vaporizes a thin surface layer, which is ablation
  • the plasma plume pushes the fragment onto a lower orbit until it burns up
  • more precise than any ground based attempt because the platform is already alongside
the ablation plume nudges the fragment onto a lower orbit

06results

  • detection reached 95.4 percent mean average precision, 98.0 percent on recall confidence
  • trajectory model reached R squared 0.979 with mean squared error 0.015
  • collision risk model reached R squared 0.981 with mean squared error 0.014
  • all three run behind one interface, upload an image and get object, orbit and risk together
Precision against recall for every class.
Fig. 4. Precision against recall for every class.
The interface running detection, orbit prediction and collision scoring on one uploaded image.
Fig. 5. The interface running detection, orbit prediction and collision scoring on one uploaded image.